<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remove the Blogger Navbar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learnonline.wordpress.com/2005/06/16/remove-the-blogger-navbar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learnonline.wordpress.com/2005/06/16/remove-the-blogger-navbar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Blackall</title>
		<link>http://learnonline.wordpress.com/2005/06/16/remove-the-blogger-navbar/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Blackall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnonline.wordpress.com/2005/06/16/remove-the-blogger-navbar/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>I think it just kills the entertainment value of the next blog button. More importantly though, how will it affect Google Search?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it just kills the entertainment value of the next blog button. More importantly though, how will it affect Google Search?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://learnonline.wordpress.com/2005/06/16/remove-the-blogger-navbar/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnonline.wordpress.com/2005/06/16/remove-the-blogger-navbar/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Wow! I did a quick test and 5 out of 10 returned as link spam. Things have gone downhill really fast. I wonder what implications this has for Blogger which is an otherwise useful (and widely used) tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I did a quick test and 5 out of 10 returned as link spam. Things have gone downhill really fast. I wonder what implications this has for Blogger which is an otherwise useful (and widely used) tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
