You are currently browsing the monthly archive for May 2006.

4am.. yep its another one of those sleepless mornings when counting sheep just won’t settle the mind. Its like waiting for santa on christmas eve, or going through your paces before a big game… this time its what I’m going to say in the 10 minutes I’ve got today to sum up everything I represent in this game of teaching and learning.

I have 10 minutes to give a presentation in the first of 4 workshops as part of a course called Designing for Flexible Learning Practice. The course is part of a new certificate called “Graduate Certificate in Tertiary Learning and Teaching” being run in my place of work. It is a certificate that all teaching academic staff will likely be expected to have in our organisation, a trend of certification I am quite familiar with in Australia.

So anyway, I’ve decided to talk about the only thing worth teaching. My presentation is the last of 3. The others are talking to case studies in flexible learning design. One is talking about the development of an online learning resource, the other (I think) is talking about the development of an online learning community for a particular occupation area. The thing that has been worrying me (and the reason I’m awake at this hour) is that with a distributed and networked learning design (that’s kinda what I want to talk about), it is difficult to find something that shows how it works at a glance.

That’s why I love Jay Cross’ graphic on informal learning. I intend to use this graphic to talk about what our organisation calls “graduate profile”. A graduate profile is what a student will be like when they finish their time with us. It has statements in it about being a life long learner, a self directed learner, and stuff like that. I want to use that profile and combine it with Jay’s illustration of informal learning, and set them up side by side and use them as the target learning outcome when designing for flexible learning.

So it might go something like this:

When a student comes to us, it is probably for one of 2 reasons. They are a novice learner and need support in starting out their learning in a particular area (a bus ride as Jay puts it); or they are an already expert learner (a bicycle rider as Jay puts it) and have to be here because some other piece of paper says they need this piece of paper. Not much I can do about the paper bit, and it certainly can be a demotivating distraction for some groups, but at least I can try to make the bus ride learning (designed for novice learners) interesting for bicycle riding self directed learners.

So, we have a group of novice learners in their first year. They are expert bicycle riders in other subject areas, but in ours they are confessing novice status and want to come on a bus ride (the lesson, or course plan). What we want to do as bus drivers is teach these people how to appreciate riding bicycles in our subject area. Make sense? Well it is 4:30am…

In short, we want these learners to be functional self directed learners in the field before they graduate. Our graduate profile is a bicycle rider.

What does this mean in real terms? It might go something like this:

In their first year (assuming we as teachers have the luxury of talking in years with our course plans) we join people to classrooms. These may be real 9 to 5 type classrooms or these may be virtual online classrooms. We start them off with presentations, lectures, our own learning materials, and otherwise passive/delivered information. But sooner than later we are asking them to start reproducing what they are learning and interacting with the subject.

In the second year (or phase) we introduce them to existing learning communities where they can witness a more informal learning process. It is here we start teaching how to learn this way. We wean them out of the classroom learning, building confidence around themselves and their understanding of the subject. We help them manage communications technology and the skills needed to work it to THEIR favour, and give incentives to use that technology in whatever informal learning they may already be involved in.

Finally in the third year or phase we add further incentives to now focus their informal learning processes on the subject. Taking their place in existing subject oriented learning communities, developing a voice within it and/or breaking away and starting a new learning community. The main point is to develop a person to be an expert self directed learner in the field before they walk out that “door” with a funny hat and a rolled up peice of paper.

Now with that seemingly obvious objective out of the way, what are some of the impediments to that happening? Well, the classroom for one. If by the end of the 3rd year or phase, your classroom or learning management system is still full, then the objective is still a long way off. You need to get as many as you can out of your classroom (bus) an on their own journey (bicycle) as you can in the short amount of tiime you have. In more than a few cases some people may take a lot longer to develop confidence in learning the field informally than others, a few of these may come to realise that your field is not what interests them. Other obstacles are in measuring learning or assessment, but these bureaucratic challenges are where the fun begins for a creative and energetic teacher.

So, its 5 am and I think I’ll sleep on it for an hour or so now. But at least I have it out now. Its rough, and may not make any sense to anyone but me – I bet there are a bunch of people who are thinking that I have just contradicted myself in all this, but I have that in mind and I don’t think I have. When I come to re-reading this, all puffy eyed and at work – we’ll see.

Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (Attribution) license.

–>

[blip.tv ?posts_id=92654&dest=-1]

It was for the AusTAFE 2005 conference I first uttered those words, along with a list of other provocative statements from the co presenters. Now, over a year later, I have the chance to say them again and back’m up with a bit more content specific to the statement. I plan to say them at Education Au’s Global Summit:

Teaching is Dead, long live learning. Your comments, warnings, heads up and suggestions would be very much appreciated in the page’s discussion forum of course.

Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (Attribution) license.

–>


Scott Wilson points to Jay Cross’ big graphic on informal learning.

–>

I was there, be it 34 minutes late. According to the TALO wiki we were up for another online meet up through TeamSpeak… what’s happening, we were going so well with that too..?

Next one is May 31st – 7pm Sydney time, that’s 9pm my time.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, Joseph Hart!

Could you have a use for a free, incredibly easy to use, web based and therefore potentially collaborative flow chart/concept mapping tool? Who doesn’t have a need for such a thing. I love this tool. Gliffy.com I love you!!

A colleague at work sent me this link today, as we increase our hopes of getting Open Office at least available on all school computers:

A new, yet-to-be-fixed security hole in Microsoft Word exposes computer users to cyberattack, Symantec warned Friday.

Would-be intruders already have attempted to compromise PCs at a Japanese government entity by exploiting the flaw, Vincent Weafer, the senior director at Symantec Security Response, said in an interview. In response, Symantec has raised its ThreatCon to Level 2, which means an outbreak is expected.

So that now means if you use Internet Explorer, Outlook, and Word, you are putting your work at risk. So use Firefox, Thunderbird and Open Office… they’re better applications anyway!

Right when I was poised to unsubscribe from that at times annoying EdNA feed, I was reminded of how valuable it has been for me. Today it pointed me to:

Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing. An Internet Discussion about Scientific and Scholarly Journals and Their Future

The publication discusses the future of scholarship and science, back in 1995.


We have heard many sanguine predictions about the demise of paper publishing, but life is short and the inevitable day still seems a long way off. This is a subversive proposal that could radically hasten that day. It is applicable only to ESOTERIC (non-trade, no-market) scientific and scholarly publication (but that is the lion’s share of the academic corpus anyway), namely, that body of work for which the author does not and never has expected to SELL the words. The scholarly author wants only to PUBLISH them, that is, to reach the eyes and minds of peers, fellow esoteric scientists and scholars the world over, so that they can build on one another’s contributions in that cumulative. collaborative enterprise called learned inquiry. For centuries, it was only out of reluctant necessity that authors of esoteric publications entered into the Faustian bargain of allowing a price-tag to be erected as a barrier between their work and its (tiny) intended readership, for that was the only way they could make their work public at all during the age when paper publication (and its substantial real expenses) was their only option.

Given that this was aparently published way back in 1995 and was last updated in 2002, that must mean academics would be starting to read this one…

Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (Attribution) license.

–>

Poor old Bill Kerr, high school teacher in South Australia is having to work under extreme conditions of Internet censorship in SA Schools. NSW schools have gone the same way, and I’m discovering some censorship here in New Zealand.

Bill posts a though provoking post on the issue, Censorware and fascist connections. As well as a too close to the bone bit of humour.

Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (Attribution) license.

–>

Painting by the great Mark TanseyInnocent Eye Test.

Was scrolling through the EdNA feed this morning when the headline Teacher Training Resource Bank caught my eye. But then I read the subtext lifted from the TTRB home page and I reach for my revolver…

provides access to the research & evidence base underpinning teacher education, and a range of other relevant materials. All materials are quality assured through a rigorous process of academic scrutiny and monitoring undertaken by a team of expert teacher educators from the United Kingdom.

My anti academia kicks in and I click the link to pull this shite to pieces..

No feed
Terms and conditions:

By registering on and using this web site you are accepting and will be bound by the terms and conditions set out below and by the Privacy Statement…
All rights, including copyright, in the content of these web pages, including but not limited to graphical images are owned or controlled for these purposes by RM.

A picture like this in the banner:

Ah! I know, here goes Leigh – poo pooing other’s work again, but I just can’t help it. Stuff like this – setting itself up to be something better, somehow worth more, dismissing the success of democratic authoring, maintaining the church… I just can’t stand it. I have to face lackademics who think like this every day and I just say, “cock the hammer..”

Sorry, I will try to be more useful in the future. I’m aware that my rants are over riding my raves in this blog lately. I need to focus on the things I love, will try more and unsubscribe from feeds that keep bringing this into my field of reference.. perhaps I’m wrong about the TTRB, maybe there is good stuff in there, and maybe it is reaching the dark net.. who knows?

Anyway, if you want more useful stuff from me, check out my work blog, check out my screen recordings, check out my latest wikipedia contributions

Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (Attribution) license.

–>

Its posts like this that I wish I was a primary school teacher again…

–>